Denote the abundances in numbers (not percent) as
and
Then if we assume that there are no other isotopes found in nature,
Also, by the definition of relative atomic mass:
There is no more information and we have only two linear equations for three unknowns. Usually this means infinitely many solutions.
From the first equation substitute it into the second equation:
or
...
Denote the abundances in numbers (not percent) as
and
Then if we assume that there are no other isotopes found in nature,
Also, by the definition of relative atomic mass:
There is no more information and we have only two linear equations for three unknowns. Usually this means infinitely many solutions.
From the first equation substitute it into the second equation:
or
or
Therefore So if we would know
(or
or
), we could find the other abundances.
To find the relative abundances in percent, we have to multiply
and
by
The formal answer for your question is "not enough data." Also note that the atomic masses of isotopes are almost always integers, while your numbers aren't.
No comments:
Post a Comment