Friday, January 31, 2014

How does Lula react when she sees Scout and Jem arrive at the First Purchase Church with Calpurnia in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Lula believes white children do not belong in a black church.


Lula is not happy to see Scout and Jem with Calpurnia at First Purchase because it is an African-American church and she doesn’t think white children should be there. When Calpurnia tries to tell Lula that Scout and Jem are her company, Lula objects, saying Calpurnia is not company at the Finch house during the week. 


Lula stopped, but she said, “You ain’t got...

Lula believes white children do not belong in a black church.


Lula is not happy to see Scout and Jem with Calpurnia at First Purchase because it is an African-American church and she doesn’t think white children should be there. When Calpurnia tries to tell Lula that Scout and Jem are her company, Lula objects, saying Calpurnia is not company at the Finch house during the week. 



Lula stopped, but she said, “You ain’t got no business bringin‘ white chillun here—they got their church, we got our’n. It is our church, ain’t it, Miss Cal?”


 Calpurnia said, “It’s the same God, ain’t it?” (Chapter 12) 



Scout and Jem become uncomfortable during this altercation and want to go home. Calpurnia refuses to be intimidated. Scout is surprised to hear her speaking like the other African Americans because she is used to hearing her use the language and grammar the town's white people use. She doesn’t realize most African Americans do not have access to education, so speaking like a white person would make Calpurnia an outsider when she is at church. 


Calpurnia’s son Zeebo gives Scout and Jem a warm welcome and tells them not to pay any attention to Lula.  



One of them stepped from the crowd. It was Zeebo, the garbage collector. “Mister Jem,” he said, “we’re mighty glad to have you all here. Don’t pay no ‘tention to Lula, she’s contentious because Reverend Sykes threatened to church her. She’s a troublemaker from way back, got fancy ideas an’ haughty ways—we’re mighty glad to have you all” (Chapter 12).



Although Zeebo welcomes the children, he is also extra polite and respectful. He treats Jem and Scout this way because they are white. Although Jem is younger than Zeebo, Zeebo calls him "Mister Jem." He is essentially proving Lula's point, even if he doesn't mean anything by it.

What are three reasons that demonstrate why Charlie's life wasn't better after the surgery?

In "Flowers for Algernon" by Daniel Keyes, it could be argued that Charlie's life was not a better one after his surgery. As he became more and more intelligent, Charlie realized, for example, that the people he thought were his friends from work really were not. They used and abused him. They made fun of him and did some pretty terrible things to him. However, before he gained intelligence, he really thought they were his...

In "Flowers for Algernon" by Daniel Keyes, it could be argued that Charlie's life was not a better one after his surgery. As he became more and more intelligent, Charlie realized, for example, that the people he thought were his friends from work really were not. They used and abused him. They made fun of him and did some pretty terrible things to him. However, before he gained intelligence, he really thought they were his friends. He loved them and he laughed along with them. As an intelligent man, he lost that. Once he saw who his co-workers really were, he no longer had them as his friends.


Charlie also quickly left everyone behind with his newfound intelligence. He got to the point where it was almost impossible to communicate with anyone including the doctors who performed the surgery.


And finally, he fell in love with Miss Kinnian but quickly surpassed her intelligence, so that they both knew their love would never work. 


Though Charlie got to experience a life he never would have had, he lost at least as much as he gained.

In Things Fall Apart, how does the main character Okonkwo's fear of being thought a coward affect the story?

In Things Fall Apart, Okonkwo's decisions determine the direction of the story, and his decisions are often based on his fear of being thought cowardly. At the beginning of the story, Okonkwo is considered great because he is a great wrestler, a great warrior, and a successful man with two barns filled with yams, three wives, and many children. But Okonkwo has a weak chi, and has difficulty connecting with his nurturing feminine side.


...

In Things Fall Apart, Okonkwo's decisions determine the direction of the story, and his decisions are often based on his fear of being thought cowardly. At the beginning of the story, Okonkwo is considered great because he is a great wrestler, a great warrior, and a successful man with two barns filled with yams, three wives, and many children. But Okonkwo has a weak chi, and has difficulty connecting with his nurturing feminine side.


Okonkwo adopts a boy, Ikemefuna, gifted to his village from a neighbouring village. He loves Ikemefuna and thinks he will be a good role model for his son, Nwoye, who he considers lazy. When the Oracle of the Hills and Caves demands that Okonkwo take Ikemefuna's life, Okonkwo has a decision to make. He talks to an elder, who advises him not to kill Ikemefuna, but Okonkwo chooses to kill the boy regardless because he does not want to appear cowardly. This decision sets in motion the rest of the events that make up the story.


When Okonkwo kills Ikemefuna in a ritual, his relationship with his son Nwoye is ruined. Okonkwo is later banished to his mother's village for seven years. During the time he is away, Christian missionaries arrive in Igboland. Okonkwo's estranged son Nwoye is among the Igbos who embrace the new religion. When Okonkwo finally returns to his village, he joins the uprising against the Christians, and finds himself pitted against his own son.


Okonkwo's fear of being thought cowardly causes him to ignore the advice of the village elder and destroy his relationship with his own son. It also makes him constantly ignore his nurturing side and make decisions that result in violent actions, including his final decision to take his own life.


You can read more about Things Fall Apart , and learn more about the main character, Okonkwo, .

What are the similarities between capitalism and communism?

Both capitalism and communism are economic philosophies that concern how surplus might be allocated in a particular society. From there on out, the two are quite different. 


Capitalism is an economic philosophy that aims to foster the growth of individual economic pursuits. In a capitalist society, individuals are free to choose where to invest their money based on what they think is valuable, and the state protects this right. Unfortunately, this can result in great...

Both capitalism and communism are economic philosophies that concern how surplus might be allocated in a particular society. From there on out, the two are quite different. 


Capitalism is an economic philosophy that aims to foster the growth of individual economic pursuits. In a capitalist society, individuals are free to choose where to invest their money based on what they think is valuable, and the state protects this right. Unfortunately, this can result in great economic disparities, especially when some people are systematically prevented from having equal opportunities to propose and develop their ideas as marketable. 


In a communist society, the economy is controlled by the state. Ideally, the state is able to provide for all people so their needs are met. One of the drawbacks of communism is that it can inhibit a person's ability to propose and develop new ideas because everyone is held to the same standard. While all people are offered the same liberties and access to healthcare and education under communism, it also means that people who might have profitable ideas can't develop them. All surplus money in a communist society—that is, money that doesn't go to maintaining survival—goes right back into development of the state, rather than investing in individual business opportunities. 


There are positive and negative implications of both philosophies, so I suppose you could say they have that in common, too!

Thursday, January 30, 2014

How does Luster "educate" Dave about his future in "Split Cherry Tree"?

Luster Sexton "educates" Dave about his future by explaining both by words and by example that Dave must "go on to school" so that he will not become "a dead leaf" like him. Dave must also be honest and pay his debts, whatever they may be, Luster tells his son. Thus, he also educates Dave about having integrity, especially when he expresses regret about his incorrect opinions of Professor Herbert and the school.

Dave's Pa first learns that Dave is late because his teacher, Professor Herbert, has made him stay after school to work off a debt incurred when he and some other boys split a farmer's cherry tree that they climbed to catch a lizard. Hearing this, Luster becomes angry since he perceives "bug larnin', frog larnin'....and breakin' down cherry trees" as frivolous and not appropriate to schooling. Then, when he learns that Dave is the only student who has had to stay because the other boys had the money to pay their share of the cost of the tree, Luster is even angrier. For, he feels that the teacher has discriminated against Dave since he is poor. Feeling his family pride under assault, Luster vows to go to the school:



"I'll straighten this thing out myself! I'll take keer o' Professor Herbert...He ain't go no right to keep you in and let the other boys off jist because they've got the money!...A bullet will go in a professor same as it will in any man. It will go in a rich man same as it will a poor man....



The next day, then, Luster accompanies Dave to school. There he meets Professor Herbert, who is at first intimidated by Luster's size and the sight of his gun. However, after he demonstrates to Luster what the class has been doing and he is willing to learn from Dave's father about the value of black snakes, the two men get along. After school, Dave's father insists upon helping Dave sweep and pay off his debt, telling Prof. Herbert, who has offered to cancel this debt, "We don't do things like that....We don't want somethin' fer nothin'." As they sweep together, Pa apologizes to Dave, saying that he has misjudged school because he is behind the times, a "dead leaf."

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

In a solution of sugar and water, what is the solute and what is the solvent?

A solute is a substance that is "dissolved into" the solvent, while the solvent is the substance "into which" something is dissolved. Now, when we prepare sugar water, we mix sugar into water and thus sugar is the solute, while water is the solvent. The solvent is generally the bulk phase, which is water in this case. Thus, for sugar water:


solute: sugar


solvent: water


Similarly, when we mix salt into the water to make...

A solute is a substance that is "dissolved into" the solvent, while the solvent is the substance "into which" something is dissolved. Now, when we prepare sugar water, we mix sugar into water and thus sugar is the solute, while water is the solvent. The solvent is generally the bulk phase, which is water in this case. Thus, for sugar water:


solute: sugar


solvent: water


Similarly, when we mix salt into the water to make some brine solution, salt is the solute, while water is the solvent.


While preparing solutions, we can alter the rate of the dissolution of solutes by increasing their surface area (using crushed sugar instead of sugar cubes) and by stirring the solution. We can also increase the solubility of a particular solute into solvent by increasing the temperature of the solvent.


Hope this helps. 

How does the triple bottom line lead to less profits in the long term?

The idea of a triple bottom line, "profits, planet and people", or 3BL, has at its very core the understanding that the traditional bottom line of "profits only" is not enough in a culture that is looking for, or maybe demanding is a better word, more all-around sustainability. In an age of activists and eco-terrorists who are willing to take extreme measures against any who do not think like they do it is imperative that...

The idea of a triple bottom line, "profits, planet and people", or 3BL, has at its very core the understanding that the traditional bottom line of "profits only" is not enough in a culture that is looking for, or maybe demanding is a better word, more all-around sustainability. In an age of activists and eco-terrorists who are willing to take extreme measures against any who do not think like they do it is imperative that businesses will have to adjust and adapt.


The link below to the paper by John Ikerd, "The Economics of Happiness in Agriculture", reveals in the very title that a drastic shift has taken place in the world of economics.


When resources must be spread out to constantly assess and address the effect of the business on people and the planet, there will never be as much profit as if that were not the case.


The idea as to whether this is a "good" thing or a "bad" thing depends on the side of the debate on which one finds himself or herself.

What are the differences between an approach and a theory?

These two concepts relate to scientific research and understanding, though in different ways. A theory is an explanation for how facts relate to one another, while an approach is a methodology for obtaining those facts in the first place.


A theory is a framework for understanding relationships between observable facts. In other words, they explain observations. Hypotheses become theories when enough data is gathered to support the hypothesis. Theories are mutable, and can be strengthened...

These two concepts relate to scientific research and understanding, though in different ways. A theory is an explanation for how facts relate to one another, while an approach is a methodology for obtaining those facts in the first place.


A theory is a framework for understanding relationships between observable facts. In other words, they explain observations. Hypotheses become theories when enough data is gathered to support the hypothesis. Theories are mutable, and can be strengthened or weakened based on new information that is observed. It’s important to note that the facts themselves won’t change, but rather the explanation of the facts. Jamie Tanner, professor of biology at Marlboro College, explains the relationship between theories and facts as follows:



For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact but the overarching theories about evolution, the way that we think all of the facts go together might change as new observations of evolution are made.



An approach, on the other hand, is the framework and context with which somebody conducts research. It can refer to both the method of interpretation used as well as the actual type of research conducted. For example, if investigating mental illness, an anthropologist would consider the context of the communal norms, a sociologist would consider the context of interaction between individuals, and a psychologist would consider how mental illness is experienced by the individual.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

To which country does the speaker allude in "A Modest Proposal"?

In discussing his ironic proposal--that people should solve their social and economic woes by eating the children of the poor--the speaker alludes to several countries:

First, he addresses the proposal specifically to his fellow citizens of Ireland, saying that his solution will ease Ireland's longstanding and pervasive struggles:



"For preventing the children of poor people in Ireland, from being a burden on their parents or country, and for making them beneficial to the publick."



Second, he often alludes to the tensions between Ireland and England, which is important because we need to understand that this entire satirical essay is a critique of how England isn't helping Ireland with their social and financial issues (and how Ireland isn't helping itself, either).


The speaker mentions "the Pretender" twice, meaning King James Francis Edward Stuart, so called because he made a pretty weak claim to the British crown. The speaker talks about what happens to poor babies born to poor mothers: they "either turn thieves for want of work, or leave their dear native country, to fight for the Pretender in Spain." He mentions this "Pretender" again in reference to the poor members of society who keep on having babies, "who stay at home on purpose with a design to deliver the kingdom to the Pretender." In both cases, the speaker is criticizing not just the British king but also Irish society's relationship with him.


The Irish-British tensions are conveyed even more strongly toward the end of the essay, when the speaker claims that the proposal should be totally acceptable to England:



"I fortunately fell upon this proposal, which, as it is wholly new, so it hath something solid and real, of no expence and little trouble, full in our own power, and whereby we can incur no danger in disobliging England."



Third, in developing his authoritative, cold voice and tone, the speaker mentions authorities living in other countries who would support the cannibalism the speaker is proposing. Three examples are below:



A. An American authority who lives in London, England:


"I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed, is, at a year old, a most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricasie, or a ragoust."


This American is mentioned again: "...for as to the males, my American acquaintance assured me from frequent experience, that their flesh was generally tough and lean, like that of our school-boys..."


B. A French authority:


"...for we are told by a grave author, an eminent French physician, that fish being a prolifick dyet, there are more children born in Roman Catholick countries about nine months after Lent, the markets will be more glutted than usual..."


C. A Taiwanese authority (Taiwan used to be called "Formosa"):


"...this expedient was put into his head by the famous Salmanaazor, a native of the island Formosa, who came from thence to London, above twenty years ago, and in conversation told my friend, that in his country, when any young person happened to be put to death, the executioner sold the carcass to persons of quality, as a prime dainty..."



Fourth, the speaker makes some ugly allusions to other nations as well as to Jews. Let's have a look:



"Of learning to love our country, wherein we differ even from Laplanders, and the inhabitants of Topinamboo: Of quitting our animosities and factions, nor acting any longer like the Jews, who were murdering one another at the very moment their city was taken..."



Though Lapland is a real region, "Topinamboo" seems to be a term that the speaker is using to refer to a native tribe residing in Brazil.


By understanding how all these references to different countries come together, we can better place "A Modest Proposal" in a historical and geographical context.

Monday, January 27, 2014

How does a speaker properly conclude a debate speech?

The elements involved in properly concluding a debate speech include:


1. Referencing the introduction


Hearkening back to the opening of the speech adds cohesiveness to the overall speech. It gives the listeners, at the speech’s closing, a familiar reference point so that it is easier for them to see the logical progression of the speech and tie up any loose ends at the speech’s closing. They revisit the talk’s original purpose, consider the points presented...

The elements involved in properly concluding a debate speech include:


1. Referencing the introduction


Hearkening back to the opening of the speech adds cohesiveness to the overall speech. It gives the listeners, at the speech’s closing, a familiar reference point so that it is easier for them to see the logical progression of the speech and tie up any loose ends at the speech’s closing. They revisit the talk’s original purpose, consider the points presented in the speech, then see the logical conclusion that is the result of this flow of ideas from the introduction through the body of the speech to the closing. This is how a speech is presented in an orderly and coherent manner.


2. Reusing the title


Have a compelling title to your speech to spur your audience’s interest so that they desire to hear your entire talk. Then, consider reiterating this title at the close of your speech. This has the dramatic effect of emphasizing the importance of your topic as you are at least twice referencing the title of the speech and what your speech is focusing on.


3. Making it appropriate


This may seem redundant to say. However, think of speech conclusions you may have heard where the conclusion strayed from the original intent of the speech as espoused at its beginning. Your debate speech conclusion must be attuned to all of the speech that preceded the conclusion.


Do not go off on a tangent in your conclusion. Make your conclusion precise, concise, and clear, and have it be a fitting close that leaves the listener satisfied. You want the listener to think, “Yes, that ending resolves everything nicely and fulfills my reasons for listening to the speech in the first place!”


4. Summarizing


It’s a good idea to summarize the main points of your debate speech in your conclusion. It jogs listeners’ memory of all they heard prior to the conclusion. It’s a good way to re-emphasize your important points. You subsequently present a sound conclusion to your audience with the main points the underlying structure that makes your conclusion credible – as long as the conclusion references these chief points somewhat.


5. The climax


A resonating ending to a speech, in essence, is the culmination or climax of the speech. This is where the orator closes his or her speech with words that resonate often long after the speech is delivered and everyone is on their way home. A quality closing to a speech leaves listeners wanting more and asking questions and pondering the ideas that were put forth in the speech.

What is the setting of "The Devil's Arithmetic" by Jane Yolen in Chapters One and Two?

In regards to the story, setting can also refer to the immediate surroundings, social/cultural circumstances, and historical period.


In Chapters One and Two, we learn that Hannah Stern is part of a close-knit Jewish American family in New York City. So, in terms of setting, the author has chosen to focus on the Jewish American culture or social experience in (present-day) New York City. Here, it's noteworthy to point out that the author differentiates between...

In regards to the story, setting can also refer to the immediate surroundings, social/cultural circumstances, and historical period.


In Chapters One and Two, we learn that Hannah Stern is part of a close-knit Jewish American family in New York City. So, in terms of setting, the author has chosen to focus on the Jewish American culture or social experience in (present-day) New York City. Here, it's noteworthy to point out that the author differentiates between the Jewish second-generation experience and the Jewish experience during a specific historical period (World War II) in these two chapters.


In the first chapter, Hannah lets her mother know that she isn't looking forward to the Passover seder at Grandpa Will and Grandma Belle's apartment. She complains that every Passover seder dinner is a repeat of the previous one. Hannah tells her mother that she's tired of "remembering" the Jewish Holocaust experience. 


However, Hannah's mother reminds her that her grandparents find great comfort in their presence during Passover; they value family above all else during such important celebrations. So, the social setting is that of a close-knit Jewish American family in present-day New York City. In Chapter Two, we learn why Hannah doesn't enjoy the Passover family gatherings. Her Grandpa Will seems to be fixated on the Holocaust experience; when Hannah and her family enter her grandparents' apartment, her grandfather is screaming at the TV screen. 



Across the screen marched old photos of Nazi concentration camp victims, corpses stacked like cordwood, and dead-eyed survivors. As the horrible pictures flashed by, a dark voice announced the roll of camps: "Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen, Chelmno, Dachau . . ."



So, we have a different setting here: World War II. The introduction of this setting (in terms of historical period) foreshadows the parallel universe Hannah is transported to later in the novel. The author further reinforces the tragedy and devastation of the Holocaust experience through a personal story of Hannah's. In Chapter Two, Hannah explains why she dislikes Passover seders at her grandparents. 


Accordingly, at Aaron's bris party (not long after he was born), Hannah experiences one of her grandfather's frightening screaming fits. Grandpa Will became extremely agitated when Hannah writes a string of numbers on the inside of her left arm. At the time, Hannah had thought her grandfather would be pleased by her actions; after all, he had similar numbers on his own left arm. What Hannah doesn't realize was that the numbers on Grandpa Will's arm resulted from his own incarceration during Hitler's reign of terror. 


Hannah reports that her grandfather began screaming the phrase "Malach Ha-mavis" ("Angel of Death") repeatedly after he glimpsed the numbers on Hannah's left arm. So, here, we're introduced to a setting that incorporates the Jewish Holocaust experience during World War II. In all, setting is an important literary device that establishes the mood of the story.

What is the message of the sonnet "Ozymandias?"

I think the message of the sonnet "Ozymandias" is that no matter how great or powerful someone is in life, everyone dies and everyone's memory is eventually erased by the ravages of history.


In the second part of the sonnet, the six-line sestet, Shelley reveals this message. After the inscription, the words "Nothing beside remains" (line 12) tell the audience that there is nothing left of the once-great ruler. The massive statue is referred...

I think the message of the sonnet "Ozymandias" is that no matter how great or powerful someone is in life, everyone dies and everyone's memory is eventually erased by the ravages of history.


In the second part of the sonnet, the six-line sestet, Shelley reveals this message. After the inscription, the words "Nothing beside remains" (line 12) tell the audience that there is nothing left of the once-great ruler. The massive statue is referred to as "decay" in line 12 and "Wreck" in line 13, creating an image of unrecognizable ruins, not only of the statue, but of the memory of Ozymandias, King of Kings. Then in the last two lines, Shelley describes the vast, empty desert wasteland surrounding the wreck: "...boundless and bare / The lone and level sands stretch far away." This creates an image of a massive, desolate desert, which makes the remains of the colossus seem small and insignificant, much like the remains of the memory of the tyrant Ozymandias in history.


As well as saying that tyrants are eventually forgotten, eroded from collective memory like a fallen stone statue in the desert sand, Shelley also seems to invite you to consider your own mortality. If a mighty ruler like Ozymandias's legacy can fade, what about our own legacy? Thus the message is a little bit existentialist: what is the point of life if nothing remains after death but perhaps a bit of stone with an inscription on it, like a headstone in a graveyard?


You can learn more about  and read the poem with annotations here

How do I start an essay about how the Women's Rights Movement and the Gay Rights Movement strengthened the Civil Rights Movement?

I think you need to begin such an essay by establishing the fact that all three of these movements derive from a single, historical impulse, one enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, whose second paragraph states:


"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these...

I think you need to begin such an essay by establishing the fact that all three of these movements derive from a single, historical impulse, one enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, whose second paragraph states:


"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." 


The principle that all men have inalienable rights and that the United States was formed in part to protect these sovereign rights, serves as the bedrock on which all civil rights are based. You must explain that The Civil Rights Movement was a movement to extend the full panoply of rights already guaranteed by the constitution to African Americans, regardless of where they lived.


You can also argue that the 14th Amendment (Equal Rights Amendment) and the 19th Amendment (which gave women the vote) are simply part of the larger Civil Rights movement, to extend the rights that white men had enjoyed to women and minorities. The Gay Rights Movement is just another facet of the extension of Civil Rights to minority groups. In the case of the Gay Rights Movement, the people in question are those who face discrimination as a result of their sexual orientation. 


The extension of equal protection to all classes of citizens (including women, ethnic minorities and the LGBT community) strengthened and continues to strengthen the Civil Rights Movement because the whole notion of "inalienable rights" falls apart if those rights are denied to any group of people.


In other words, if our government can deny rights to any group of people, then those rights are not inalienable. Remember, our Constitution says that the government does not and cannot confer rights or privileges to any group, or deny them. The government can only protect those rights from being infringed upon, because everyone is born with those rights. Therefore, any government that selectively protects the rights of some citizens while denying those rights to others cannot claim that its citizens have inalienable rights. 


Clearly, a government that can deny rights to a class of individuals has "alienated" or "separated" those people from their basic civil rights. That kind application of the law is what constitutional lawyers deem “arbitrary and capricious,” completely at odds with any notion of equality, and therefore, a threat to our democracy.

Sunday, January 26, 2014

How should the people view the conspirators and Caesar, according to Antony’s funeral speech?

Found in Act 3, Scene 2 of William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, this is one of the most famous speeches in all of theatre.Through it, Shakespeare has Marcus Antonius (Antony) engage in some of the greatest praeteritio of all time, claiming that he is criticizing Caesar while heaping praise upon him, and claiming that he is honoring the conspirators while deriding and disparaging them. He says repeatedly that the conspirators are "honorable men", but by...

Found in Act 3, Scene 2 of William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, this is one of the most famous speeches in all of theatre.

Through it, Shakespeare has Marcus Antonius (Antony) engage in some of the greatest praeteritio of all time, claiming that he is criticizing Caesar while heaping praise upon him, and claiming that he is honoring the conspirators while deriding and disparaging them.

He says repeatedly that the conspirators are "honorable men", but by the end he has so thoroughly detailed their lies and crimes that "honorable men" begins to sound like an insult.

In particular, Brutus often accused Caesar of being "ambitious", which doesn't sound so bad to us, but in Shakespeare's time had a connotation closer to "audacious" or even "megalomaniacal". Antonius goes through several examples of Caesar acting justly and magnanimously, each time saying that this doesn't seem very ambitious, "But Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man."

Thus, if you use the surface meaning of his words, Antonius is saying that Caesar is despicable and megalomaniacal and Brutus and the conspirators are honorable and just; but if you delve deeper into the implications of his statements, he is clearly saying that Caesar was the honorable one, a great and worthy leader who was struck down in his prime by the cruel and mendacious conspirators. But he has plausible deniability to protect himself from the conspirators---because after all, he did just say that they were all "honorable men".

What is the significance of "defamiliarization" in William Carlos William's poetry, and how he has used this technique?

Defamiliarization is the poetic process of taking ordinary objects and using them in a poem in such a way that the reader sees them as new or different. Williams often used common things in his poems, but in his poetry they become unusual, or have a greater significance than they otherwise might.


Take, for example, "This Is Just To Say":



I have eatenthe plums that were in the icebox


and whichyou were probably ...


Defamiliarization is the poetic process of taking ordinary objects and using them in a poem in such a way that the reader sees them as new or different. Williams often used common things in his poems, but in his poetry they become unusual, or have a greater significance than they otherwise might.


Take, for example, "This Is Just To Say":



I have eaten
the plums
that were in
the icebox


and which
you were probably
saving
for breakfast


Forgive me
they were delicious
so sweet
and so cold



The content of the poem is a simple note apologizing for eating someone else's plums, but the method of its presentation foregrounds the note and makes it seem more important than you might ordinarily think. Here this is done by the form of the poem, especially in the line breaks. These breaks serve to cut the note up into little pieces which demand to be considered separately, and in isolation from, the other lines.


Consider the different effect if we remove the line breaks, and add some punctuation:



I have eaten the plums in the icebox, and which you were probably saving for breakfast. Forgive me! They were delicious -- so sweet and so cold.



Now we have a simple note, in a friendly and apologetic tone -- but not very memorable. Put the first two line breaks back in and we have to consider each bit on its own:



I have eaten
the plums



These two lines can function together, but they also function separately, in that we have to first consider the (perhaps ominous) act of having eaten, and then, quite separately, the plums, which, while using totally neutral language, nevertheless brings before us an image of the fruit. You can seen the same effect at work in line seven, where the single word "saving" gets its own line. We are forced to consider the word outside the context of the note: What is being saved here, or who? 


In this way, Williams' poetry forces us to understand the importance of everyday objects, and encourages us to pay attention to everything around us.


Source: Altieri, Charles. “Presence and Reference in a Literary Text: The Example of Williams' "this Is Just to Say"”. Critical Inquiry 5.3 (1979): 489–510. 

Saturday, January 25, 2014

After the experience faced in chapter 15 of To Kill a Mockingbird, what can you conclude about Atticus's feelings towards his children?

Chapter 15 is when the Old Sarum bunch goes to the jail to lynch Tom Robinson. Atticus thinks that his kids are home safe and sound, but they show up unexpectedly and turn the whole scene around for him. Scout runs up to him thinking that it would be a great surprise for him to see her and describes his reaction as follows:


". . . but his face killed my joy. A flash of...

Chapter 15 is when the Old Sarum bunch goes to the jail to lynch Tom Robinson. Atticus thinks that his kids are home safe and sound, but they show up unexpectedly and turn the whole scene around for him. Scout runs up to him thinking that it would be a great surprise for him to see her and describes his reaction as follows:



". . . but his face killed my joy. A flash of plain fear was going out of his eyes, but returned when Dill and Jem wriggled into the light" (152). 



The fear that is expressed in Atticus's face proves how much he loves his children. At the same time, he's got to keep his nerves in check so he doesn't lose control of the situation. He tries to order Jem to take the kids home, but Jem refuses out of love and loyalty for his father. Once the whole situation ends and the mob goes home, Scout witnesses the following as they make their way home, too:



"As they passed under a streetlight Atticus reached out and massaged Jem's hair, his one gesture of affection" (155).



Since Atticus uses his one sign of affection with Jem, Scout realizes again how serious the situation was back at the jail. Plus, she thought that Atticus would be lecturing Jem for not taking the other kids home when he first asked; but, the gesture of affection shows how much he values the fact that his children didn't get hurt rather than lecturing him for disobeying.


Friday, January 24, 2014

`(x + 1)^6` Use the Binomial Theorem to expand and simplify the expression.

We have to expand the expression using the Binomial Theorem. So use the binomial formula,

`(a+b)^n=sum_(k=0)^n((n),(k))a^(n-k)b^k`


`:.(x+1)^6=((6),(0))x^(6-0)*1^0+((6),(1))x^(6-1)*1^(1)+((6),(2))x^(6-2)*1^2+((6),(3))x^(6-3)*1^3+((6),(4))x^(6-4)*1^4+((6),(5))x^(6-5)*1^5+((6),(6))x^(6-6)*1^6`


`=x^6+(6!)/(1!(6-1)!)x^5+(6!)/(2!(6-2)!)x^4+(6!)/(3!(6-3)!)x^3+(6!)/(4!(6-4)!)x^2+(6!)/(5!(6-5)!)x^1+1`


`=x^6+(6*5!)/(5!)x^5+(6*5*4!)/(2*1*4!)x^4+(6*5*4*3!)/(3*2*1*3!)x^3+(6*5*4!)/(4!*2*1)x^2+(6*5!)/(5!)x+1`


`=x^6+6x^5+15x^4+20x^3+15x^2+6x+1`

At the end of "Eveline" by James Joyce, Eveline has a sudden realization, also known as a/an:

At the end of James Joyce's "Eveline," Eveline suddenly realizes that she is unwilling to leave her life in Dublin for a life of international travel and true love. This realization is also known as an epiphany, and it is probably the single most important concept in the stories of Dubliners


Joyce's stories generally follow an individual, or at least a small group of people, wandering through fairly normal situations. What ties these stories...

At the end of James Joyce's "Eveline," Eveline suddenly realizes that she is unwilling to leave her life in Dublin for a life of international travel and true love. This realization is also known as an epiphany, and it is probably the single most important concept in the stories of Dubliners


Joyce's stories generally follow an individual, or at least a small group of people, wandering through fairly normal situations. What ties these stories together is that each of them involves an epiphany, which is a sudden realization or deep understanding about life. For the most part, these epiphanies are pretty gloomy, as they involve a deeper understanding into the stagnant nature of a character's life. In "Eveline," for instance, the epiphany involves a young woman's realization of her inability to leave her abusive home life. Within the broader context of Dublin, these epiphanies illustrate the impoverished, hopeless nature of life for most Irish citizens at the turn of the 20th century. As such, through the extended use of epiphany, Joyce executes one of his most successful social critiques. 

Do you watch reality shows? If so which one and why? What are your thoughts and opinions on reality television? (Made In Chelsea, The Only Way Is...

The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) in the United States has shown several reality shows. One of these featured several families who were put into 19th century conditions as if they were settlers. The families were competing to see who could get their house set up and their food in for the winter. 


The reality aspects of the show were the accoutrements of life in a cabin in a rural area. Outside of most of the...

The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) in the United States has shown several reality shows. One of these featured several families who were put into 19th century conditions as if they were settlers. The families were competing to see who could get their house set up and their food in for the winter. 


The reality aspects of the show were the accoutrements of life in a cabin in a rural area. Outside of most of the physical setup, nothing was real. There was even a closet in each home with modern technology so that the participants could carry on a vlog of their thoughts and experiences, making even the physical setup artificial. 


True pioneers did not compete with each other. They helped each other to survive, because survival was challenging. The element of competition, then, turned something that could have been interesting and even authentic into a cat fight between a particularly obnoxious competitor and everyone else. 


When Hollywood wants to flummox people, it puts the lie directly into the name of the thing. "Reality" television is probably much further from reality than the average sit-com. Video can be cut and manipulated. Situations can be set up to bring out the worst in people. One wonders whether the genre was developed so that studios would not have to pay professional actors. 


In short, reality television isn't real. It's a way of manipulating and humiliating people as a means of entertainment. 

Thursday, January 23, 2014

What is the theme of Maya Angelou's novel The Heart of a Woman?

Maya Angelou's "The Heart of a Woman" interweaves two stories from Angelou's life: her coming of age as a black woman/mother and the coming of age of the civil rights movement.


The memoir is centered on her struggle to raise her son, Guy. She wants desperately to bring him up as an intelligent, questioning black man who will fight for racial equality. But she also fights to keep him safe and healthy. These tensions come...

Maya Angelou's "The Heart of a Woman" interweaves two stories from Angelou's life: her coming of age as a black woman/mother and the coming of age of the civil rights movement.


The memoir is centered on her struggle to raise her son, Guy. She wants desperately to bring him up as an intelligent, questioning black man who will fight for racial equality. But she also fights to keep him safe and healthy. These tensions come into conflict at times. Throughout the book, watch for Angelou's constant concern about who Guy is associated with and what prejudices are set against him.


Alongside her concern about raising her son, Angelou's other focus is the bringing up of black women. She sees black women as an especially oppressed group. As a civil rights leader, she is constantly fighting the war against racism and oppression. Watch for her interactions with famous civil rights figures.


This public war on racism has consequences in the private raising of her son. "The black mother perceives destruction at every door," she says in the book, "ruination at each window, and even she herself is not beyond her own suspicion." Angelou is not just speaking of general difficulties in being a black mother, but also of her own specific difficulties. Angelou's memoir, then, is partially an exploration of how public work can impact private life. 

Describe the dogs that chased Snowball in Animal Farm.

The dogs that chased Snowball were the puppies he took from Jessie.


Napoleon was thinking ahead.  He knew from the very beginning that he would need to have some protection and reinforcement.  Before anyone was even thinking about the pigs taking power, he was planning to have his own secret security force created.


It happened that Jessie and Bluebell had both whelped soon after the hay harvest, giving birth between them to nine sturdy puppies....

The dogs that chased Snowball were the puppies he took from Jessie.


Napoleon was thinking ahead.  He knew from the very beginning that he would need to have some protection and reinforcement.  Before anyone was even thinking about the pigs taking power, he was planning to have his own secret security force created.



It happened that Jessie and Bluebell had both whelped soon after the hay harvest, giving birth between them to nine sturdy puppies. As soon as they were weaned, Napoleon took them away from their mothers, saying that he would make himself responsible for their education. (Ch. 3)



Napoleon took these puppies when they were young and had them kept secretly away from all of the other animals.  The other animals pretty much forgot about them.  Meanwhile, Napoleon had them secretly trained to become guard dogs and enforcers.  When Napoleon decided Snowball had outlived his usefulness, he had him run off.  He used the dogs to do it.  Almost fully grown, they were now big and scary.



At first no one had been able to imagine where these creatures came from, but the problem was soon solved: they were the puppies whom Napoleon had taken away from their mothers and reared privately. Though not yet full−grown, they were huge dogs, and as fierce−looking as wolves. (Ch. 4)



These dogs become Napoleon’s bodyguards.  They stay close to him, and if anyone says or does anything he disagrees with, then they growl and look scary.  The dogs also kill on Napoleon’s command, and soon no one is willing to say anything against Napoleon.


The secret dog police are an example of Napoleon’s cunning mind.  He realized that if he was going to manipulate everyone into giving him control, eventually he would need to use force.  Napoleon therefore arranged to take the animals with the sharpest teeth, animals that others would fear, and make them his enforcers so that no one could threaten his power.

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Do you think that following Emerson's philosophy, as described in "Self-Reliance," would lead to happiness?

I think you can defend at least two different answers to this question.

First, you can reasonably argue that a follower of Emerson's philosophy would experience a particular type of happiness called "eudaimonia." This isn't the kind of happiness that makes you laugh, but rather the type that makes you feel your life has meaning.


Second, you might argue that the ultimate goal of this philosophy isn't any sort of happiness—not even the eudaimonic type. Instead, the goal is to transcend all normal human emotion and replace it with a godlike appreciation for what's right and true about the world.


Let's take each answer in more detail.


Psychologists recognize two different kinds of happiness. Hedonic happiness is what we feel when we gratify our senses, seek pleasures, and avoid pain. Eudaimonic happiness is the reward we find meaning in life, experience a sense of purpose, or perceive ourselves to be learning, improving, or realizing our potential. Eudaimonic happiness has been linked with both a sense of autonomy —striving towards personal values or goals—and a sense a meaningful, social connectedness.


Clearly, Emerson warns against expecting a lot of hedonic happiness. We might experience some, because Emerson is telling us to follow our best impulses, and these impulses may lead to pleasurable sensory experiences, like listening to music. If we march to our own drum, though, other people will oppose and misjudge us. Life will be more difficult:



For nonconformity the world whips you with its displeasure.



Eudaimonic happiness is a different matter. Emerson speaks of the sense of satisfaction that comes from doing what you are intrinsically motivated to do:



A man is relieved and gay when he has put his heart into his work and done his best.



Emerson hints that adopting his philosophy delivers peace of mind:



[T]he great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude.



There is the obvious point: Following your inner voice may mean doing what you love.



I will so trust that what is deep is holy, that I will do strongly before the sun and moon whatever inly rejoices me, and the heart appoints.



Presumably, Emerson is talking about more than purely hedonic pursuits here. Throughout the essay, he cites the work of philosophers, artists, and scientists who produced great intellectual work, and Emerson himself was a poet. Doing what "inly rejoices him" includes activities that bring a sense of meaning and self-improvement.


Yet we could also argue that the ultimate aim of Emerson's philosophy isn't any sort of happiness—at least, not as we usually define the term. Emerson thinks the ultimate goal is transcendental, to rise above one's self. This involves leaving our normal passions behind.



In the hour of vision, there is nothing that can be called gratitude, nor properly joy. The soul raised over passion beholds identity and eternal causation, perceives the self-existence of Truth and Right, and calms itself with knowing that all things go well.



Taking on this "God's eye view" of the world means transcending the private self and our personal emotions. In that respect, the true Emersonian might not have feelings that match the definition of eudaimonic happiness, but he or she will feel this timeless, calm sense that "all things go well."



Reference


Ryan RM and Deci EL. 2001. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol. 52:141-66.

In The Story of my Life, how did Helen overcome her helplessness? Explain.

In The Story of My Lifeby Helen Keller, Helen reveals her helplessness as she struggles to mimic those around her, especially her parents but is unable to find any satisfaction or understand her situation except to know that she is "different from other people." In an effort to be like her mother she "moved my lips and gesticulated frantically without result," even though she knows that others communicate this way. Her desperation is so real,...

In The Story of My Life by Helen Keller, Helen reveals her helplessness as she struggles to mimic those around her, especially her parents but is unable to find any satisfaction or understand her situation except to know that she is "different from other people." In an effort to be like her mother she "moved my lips and gesticulated frantically without result," even though she knows that others communicate this way. Her desperation is so real, that in chapter 2, Helen describes her life as "that silent, aimless, dayless life."


When Annie Sullivan arrives, Helen's life is about to change forever as Annie introduces Helen to words. Helen's first realization that words are the key to communication comes when she first learns that "W-A-T-E-R meant the wonderful cool something that was flowing over my hand" (chapter 4).  Helen admits that she is so encouraged that she "longed for a new day to come." 


Helen is able to overcome so many difficulties and is encouraged to "learn from life itself," taking every event and turning it into a learning opportunity. In among these events is one of the worst experiences for her and which she talks about in chapter 14 when she refers to "The Frost King;" a particularly painful memory for Helen. However, as Helen is still young, she is able to move on eventually from the unpleasantness associated with her alleged plagiarism although she is mindful that this really could have "broken my spirit beyond repairing" (chapter 14). Everything is manageable for Helen as long as she has Annie' support because she is the only one who can "turn drudgery into pleasure" (chapter 18). 

In The Outsiders, why does Ponyboy take responsibility for killing Bob Sheldon?

When Randy Adderson visits Ponyboy, Pony tells him that he killed Bob Sheldon. When Randy tries to correct Ponyboy by telling him that Johnny killed Bob, Pony doesn't listen to Randy and insists that he killed Bob. The reason Ponyboy takes responsibility for killing Bob Sheldon is because he is suffering from Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.Ponyboy had just witnessed the deaths of his two close friends. He is having a hard time accepting reality, and...

When Randy Adderson visits Ponyboy, Pony tells him that he killed Bob Sheldon. When Randy tries to correct Ponyboy by telling him that Johnny killed Bob, Pony doesn't listen to Randy and insists that he killed Bob. The reason Ponyboy takes responsibility for killing Bob Sheldon is because he is suffering from Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Ponyboy had just witnessed the deaths of his two close friends. He is having a hard time accepting reality, and attempts to repress his memories. He refuses to believe Johnny is dead and takes responsibility for Bob's murder. Pony is subconsciously trying to deal with the deaths of his two friends and struggles to accept the reality of the situation. Since Ponyboy is mentally ill after witnessing such traumatic experiences, he is not asked any specific questions about the murder during the trial.

Who was at fault for starting the Korean War?

The Korean War is an interesting case study in early Cold War policy in that both China and the United States were used by the leaders of North and South Korea in their own political goals.  Korea was divided after WWII into two spheres of influence--the North governed with aid from the Soviet Union and China and the South governed with aid from America and the West.  The leader of North Korea, Kim Il-sung wanted...

The Korean War is an interesting case study in early Cold War policy in that both China and the United States were used by the leaders of North and South Korea in their own political goals.  Korea was divided after WWII into two spheres of influence--the North governed with aid from the Soviet Union and China and the South governed with aid from America and the West.  The leader of North Korea, Kim Il-sung wanted to unite the country under his banner.  The Soviet Union would not help him, as they thought that this would touch off a nuclear WWIII with the West, and Stalin was not ready for that.  Il-sung appealed to China for backing, and North Korea successfully invaded South Korea.  The leader of South Korea, Syngman Rhee said that this was communist aggression and America and the U.N. should help his nation.  After the Communists were beaten back out of South Korea, Rhee wanted to invade North Korea and put the nation under his control.  Ultimately, the war would end in a stalemate; since it was an armistice that ended the conflict and not a peace treaty, technically America and North Korea are still at war today.  


To answer your question in the shortest manner possible, North Korea is responsible for starting the Korean War, but they received aid and encouragement from China, so they are somewhat culpable as well.  

Are there any quotes that suggest it was worth it that Romeo and Juliet died in the name of love?

Both Romeo and Juliet suggest that their love is eventually doomed so they must live as passionately as possible in the time they have. As early as Act I, Scene 4 Romeo believes that fate is ruling his life and that death is imminent. This worry, however, turns to joy after he meets Juliet. Juliet tells Romeo during the balcony scene that she doesn't want to let him go and that she might kill him with love:


...

Both Romeo and Juliet suggest that their love is eventually doomed so they must live as passionately as possible in the time they have. As early as Act I, Scene 4 Romeo believes that fate is ruling his life and that death is imminent. This worry, however, turns to joy after he meets Juliet. Juliet tells Romeo during the balcony scene that she doesn't want to let him go and that she might kill him with love:



Sweet, so would I.
Yet I should kill thee with much cherishing.



Romeo tells Frar Lawrence that it doesn't matter if he dies as long he is joined in marriage with Juliet. In Act II, Scene 6, he says,



Do thou but close our hands with holy words,
Then love-devouring death do what he dare,
It is enough I may but call her mine.



Romeo purposely ignores the Friar's advice to take things slowly. He is living in the moment, absorbed by his love for Juliet and even when the Friar says, "These violent delights have violent ends," suggesting that no good can come of the impetuous romance, Romeo fails to listen. 


Death is also on Juliet's mind in her soliloquy in Act III, Scene 2 as she waits anxiously for her honeymoon night with Romeo. As she speaks of the beauty of night, she pictures herself dead in heaven but Romeo is there in the guise of the stars:




Give me my Romeo, and when I shall die,
Take him and cut him out in little stars,
And he will make the face of heaven so fine
That all the world will be in love with night
And pay no worship to the garish sun.





Later in the play, both Romeo and Juliet threaten suicide as they speak with Friar Lawrence. They would just as soon die as be separated.


Tuesday, January 21, 2014

What passages in To Kill a Mockingbird describe where the jail, courthouse, post office, and bank are situated?

In Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, the post office is the very first building in the town square one would reach if one was heading into town from the Finches' residential street. We know this because, by Chapter 11, the children decide they should start walking into town to meet Atticus at the post office when he comes home from work. We also know, based on Scout's observations in the last chapter, that the post office can be seen from the Radley's porch, which is at the end of the Finches' street, to the south of the Finches.

We learn a bit about what the town square looks like based on Scout's descriptions in Chapter 15, when the three children walk into town at 10 o'clock at night to check up on Atticus. The children enter town by the post office and observe that the "south side of the square was deserted"; this tells us that the post office must be on the south side of the square. Scout further observes that a "light shone in the county toilet, otherwise that side of the courthouse was dark." This tells us that the courthouse must be positioned between the post office and the county toilet, all on the south side of the square--the side nearest the end of the Finches' residential street.

Scout further observes that a "larger square of stores surrounded the courthouse square." The Maycomb Bank building is situated in this larger square of stores. We know the bank cannot be seen from where the children first emerge by the post office because they have to go around the "corner of the square" to see Atticus's car parked in front of the bank; therefore, the bank must be just beyond the courthouse.

Also in Chapter 15, when the children don't find Atticus in his office in the bank building, they decide to try Mr. Underwood, editor and owner of The Maycomb Tribune, who lives above his own office. Scout notes that The Maycomb Tribune office is on the "northwest corner of the square," which places it opposite to the courthouse and to the west. Scout further notes that they "had to pass the jail" to reach Mr. Underwood's office; therefore the jail is positioned in the square nearer to the courthouse then Mr. Underwood's office. Scout further notes that the jail is "wedged between Tyndal's Hardware Store and The Maycomb Tribune office." In addition, when the lynch mob, led by Walter Cunningham Sr., arrives at the jailhouse in cars, the cars drive around the square, pass the bank, and stop at the jail. Therefore, from the end of the Finches' street, the jail can be reached by going around the courthouse and past the bank in a northerly direction, while walking along the west side of the square. Plus, when walking in a northerly direction along the west side of the square, Tyndal's Hardware store is reached just prior to the jail.

What do you think about the way the nurses spoke to grandma at the doctor's office in Eudora Welty's "A Worn Path"?

Note that the lady in the street also calls Phoenix "Grandma." While in many cases this would seem to be an endearing term, in this case it seems to have a tone of condescension. The lady is willing to help, but instead of "Grandma" she could have said "Miss" and this would have been a more formal greeting. 


When she gets to the doctor's office, an attendant assumes that Phoenix is a "charity case" based...

Note that the lady in the street also calls Phoenix "Grandma." While in many cases this would seem to be an endearing term, in this case it seems to have a tone of condescension. The lady is willing to help, but instead of "Grandma" she could have said "Miss" and this would have been a more formal greeting. 


When she gets to the doctor's office, an attendant assumes that Phoenix is a "charity case" based upon her appearance. The attendant asks her a series of questions, but Phoenix is in a daze from her long journey. Instead of being polite and concerned, the attendant rudely yells "Are you deaf?" 


Then the nurse comes in and informs the attendant that Phoenix is not seeking treatment for herself. She is there to help her grandson. Initially, the nurse is kind and tells Phoenix to take a seat after her long trip. The nurse calls her Aunt Phoenix. This is significantly more polite than "Grandma" because she has the courtesy to use Phoenix's name. The nurse does get frustrated when Phoenix doesn't answer her questions. The nurse scolds Phoenix, saying to her "Tell us quickly about your grandson, and get it over. He isn't dead, is he?" So, even though the nurse initially appeared kind, she quickly treats Phoenix like an annoyance. Rather than marvel at Phoenix's determination to help her grandson, in spite of her old age, the workers at the clinic treat her like a nuisance. 


The nurse gives her the medicine, adding "But it's an obstinate case." Here, the nurse implies that either the grandson's ailment is persistent or that Phoenix is stubborn for continually trying to make him better with the medicine. After trying to "hush" Phoenix, who has begun talking too much for the nurse's taste, the nurse does offer some money to Phoenix because it is Christmas. This flippant act of charity is slightly admirable, but it has come after a series of condescending comments and gestures. Those at the clinic agree to help Phoenix, but in subtle and sometimes overt ways, they treat her like a nuisance. 

Monday, January 20, 2014

In the part of Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby beginning with “He had changed since," what are ten words that contribute to the impact of the...

This passage in the first chapter of The Great Gatsby (Fitzgerald) has many words that let the reader know what Nick's thoughts are about Tom Buchanan.  Here is a list:



Hard


Supercilious


Arrogant


Enormous


Boots


Dominance


Aggressively


Power


Muscle


Cruel (11)



This is a man who is consistent in mind and body, large, aggressive, arrogant, and bullying.  He is portrayed in riding clothes, which contributes to this image, even though the clothes have "effeminate swank"...

This passage in the first chapter of The Great Gatsby (Fitzgerald) has many words that let the reader know what Nick's thoughts are about Tom Buchanan.  Here is a list:



Hard


Supercilious


Arrogant


Enormous


Boots


Dominance


Aggressively


Power


Muscle


Cruel (11)



This is a man who is consistent in mind and body, large, aggressive, arrogant, and bullying.  He is portrayed in riding clothes, which contributes to this image, even though the clothes have "effeminate swank" (11).  No matter how effeminate these riding clothes may be, they serve to conjure up someone astride a horse with a riding crop firmly in hand, and not necessarily used with just the horse.  The boots complete this picture, making it easy to see him kicking or tromping on others, even if not literally. His body strains against the clothing and the boots, which can barely contain his largeness and his aggression. And just in case the reader is not clear about the kind of man Tom Buchanan is, the last sentence in the paragraph tells us that Tom has a "cruel body" (11).  From a young man of great physical prowess in college, where Nick had known him last, Tom has become not only strong, but also cruel.

What's up with the puppy? Why do you suppose Fitzgerald included it as an element in this chapter?

Myrtle decides en route to the apartment Tom keeps for her in Manhattan that she wants Tom to buy her a puppy. He indifferently complies.


The puppy represents Myrtle. Myrtle might want a protective "police dog," but what she gets is a tiny puppy that "cowered" and is, as the racist and classist Tom thinks of people like Myrtle, of "an indeterminate breed." The vendor tells Myrtle that she is getting a male, but Tom...

Myrtle decides en route to the apartment Tom keeps for her in Manhattan that she wants Tom to buy her a puppy. He indifferently complies.


The puppy represents Myrtle. Myrtle might want a protective "police dog," but what she gets is a tiny puppy that "cowered" and is, as the racist and classist Tom thinks of people like Myrtle, of "an indeterminate breed." The vendor tells Myrtle that she is getting a male, but Tom rather brutally informs her that (like her) it is a "bitch." 


Like Myrtle, the puppy is out of place. Myrtle might put on airs, but she has no more real place in Tom's world than the puppy. The "elevator" boy has to find a box of straw and milk for the puppy, to which he adds a tin of dog biscuits. One of the biscuits "decomposed apathetically in the saucer of milk all afternoon": a sad and unpleasant image. Myrtle wants to buy it a "little collar," a symbol of ownership as much as the chiffon dress from Tom she flounces in. Despite her bravado and strong personality, she is, like the puppy, very vulnerable, as we see when Tom hits her. Like the puppy, she is one of Tom's "purchases." 


That the puppy symbolizes her is emphasized near the end of the novel, when Tom tells of crying when he sees "that damn box of dog biscuits sitting there on the sideboard." He also says that Gatsby ran over Myrtle "like you'd run over a dog." 

How did the expansion of trade end feudalism?

The Belgian Historian Henri Pirenne is well known for his work in the study of feudalism in Europe. He proposes that increased levels of trade brought the decline of feudalism in Europe. Pirenne does not believe that trade and feudalism are reconcilable.  As the crusaders successfully opened the East to trade, a profound transformation occurred in Europe that closed the era of feudalism in Europe. Trade is not only a catalyst for economic advancement but...

The Belgian Historian Henri Pirenne is well known for his work in the study of feudalism in Europe. He proposes that increased levels of trade brought the decline of feudalism in Europe. Pirenne does not believe that trade and feudalism are reconcilable.  As the crusaders successfully opened the East to trade, a profound transformation occurred in Europe that closed the era of feudalism in Europe. Trade is not only a catalyst for economic advancement but is important for the exchange of culture and ideas. This cultural diffusion often leads to changes in economic and political systems.


The creation of new wealth through trade was important to ending the manor system. Agriculture, with its technological limitations, had grown stagnant over the years. The only way to make it more profitable was by working the peasants even harder and for longer hours. There was a tremendous demand for spices and luxury goods from the Orient.  This made trade profitable.   The expansion of trade led to a population shift towards urban areas. Many peasants realized that they could make a better life for themselves in the cities. In this way, the landlords lost their source of labor to merchants in the urban areas.

In the novel Lord of the Flies, what are Jack and Ralph's ethical and moral decisions?

Both Ralph and Jack in Lord of the Fliesviolate moral codes of conduct, but Ralph shows sorrow and attempts to correct his conduct while Jack continues unabated in his immoral ways. In the very first chapter of the book, Ralph violates Piggy's trust by mocking him about his nickname and telling it to others. When he sees that Piggy's feelings are hurt, he "hovered between two courses of apology or further insult." Even though...

Both Ralph and Jack in Lord of the Flies violate moral codes of conduct, but Ralph shows sorrow and attempts to correct his conduct while Jack continues unabated in his immoral ways. In the very first chapter of the book, Ralph violates Piggy's trust by mocking him about his nickname and telling it to others. When he sees that Piggy's feelings are hurt, he "hovered between two courses of apology or further insult." Even though his apology isn't as heartfelt as it could have been, at least he doesn't hurt him further. Ralph is genuinely troubled by having lost a littlun in the fire and makes attempts to control the fire and how the boys behave with it thereafter. He takes his role as leader seriously and tries to think about others rather than himself most of the time. Although Ralph takes part in the mock pig hunt where Robert gets beat up a little, he is uneasy about it afterward. Ralph's biggest moral failing is taking part in the wild dance where Simon dies. He is horrified afterward and calls it murder. To calm his burning conscience, he agrees with Piggy on an excuse, denying his part in it. The weight of the two deaths on his conscience may be a big reason for the changes in Ralph's mental capacity after Simon dies. He begins to have trouble focusing on being rescued. When Jack steals Piggy's glasses, Ralph determines to take the moral high ground and goes to confront Jack at Castle Rock. He refuses to paint himself like a savage, a sign that he is clinging to traditional behavior rather than the disdain for rules that the paint gives the boys. He tells Jack he is a thief and demands Piggy's glasses back. His argument to Jack is a moral argument. Because of his own morals, Ralph finds it hard to believe that Jack's group can be such savages that they want to harm or kill him when he has done nothing to them.


Jack shows less compunction about being cruel to others or neglectful of his duties. He mocks Piggy and shows contempt for the littluns, even joking that they could use a younger boy as a "real pig" so they can kill him. He lets the signal fire go out at a key time when they could have been rescued and then makes excuses for his actions. During a meeting he punches Piggy in a rage and breaks his glasses, and when Ralph calls him out on it, he apologizes, but it is insincere; he only does it so he can win the boys over to his side with his display of magnanimity. He sows dissension in the group, leading a rebellion against Ralph, and entices the boys away with promises of fun and hunting rather than taking an interest in the long-term welfare of the group. He leads the crazed feast where Simon is killed and seems to have no regrets about it. His band steals Piggy's glasses, and when Ralph confronts him about being a thief, Jack kidnaps Samneric and charges at Ralph, wounding him with a spear. When Piggy is murdered in front of him by one of his tribe, Jack simply warns Ralph that he will suffer a similar fate. By this time, it is clear Jack has abandoned all moral principles, being willing to steal, kidnap, maim, and kill for what he wants.

Sunday, January 19, 2014

What do you believe to be the single most important reason as to why the Europeans in Things Fall Apart were able to undermine and destroy the...

For me, I find that the biggest reason that European influence is able to grow into a pervasive force in Umuofia is because the Ibo tribal elders do not treat the arrival of Christian missionaries as the threat to their culture and values that the missionaries eventually become. The Ibo are initially uneasy at the Europeans’ entrance into the region, but quickly become dismissive and disregard the potential of the new Religion to take roots...

For me, I find that the biggest reason that European influence is able to grow into a pervasive force in Umuofia is because the Ibo tribal elders do not treat the arrival of Christian missionaries as the threat to their culture and values that the missionaries eventually become. The Ibo are initially uneasy at the Europeans’ entrance into the region, but quickly become dismissive and disregard the potential of the new Religion to take roots in Umuofia and displace traditional norms. Achebe writes:



“At first the clan had assumed that it would not survive.... The clan was worried, but not over-much. If a gang of efulefu decided to live in the Evil Forest it was their own affair. When one came to think of it, the Evil Forest was a fit home for such undesirable people” (154).



High-ranking Ibo men do not view the missionaries as overt threats. Over time, however, the Christian missionaries recruit a number of Umuofian natives, specifically the members of the clan who have been disenfranchised by the Ibo’s stratified social structure. This swell in the missionaries’ numbers demonstrates to Ibo elders the strength of European influence in Umuofia:



“And even in the matter of religion there was a growing feeling that there might be something in it after all, something vaguely akin to method in the overwhelming madness” (178).



Indeed, the elders realize their mistake in taking Europeans lightly, and this oversight alters the culture of the region forever.

What literary devices are used in Macbeth Act V, Scene 7?

As the opposing armies make their way toward his stronghold, Macbeth uses a metaphor to describe his situation. He says that his enemies have tied him "to a stake...bear-like." This is a reference to bear baiting, a blood sport popular in Shakespeare's day, in which bears would be tied to stakes and forced to fight off dogs until they finally succumbed. After setting the tone with this gruesome literary device, which reveals Macbeth's state of...

As the opposing armies make their way toward his stronghold, Macbeth uses a metaphor to describe his situation. He says that his enemies have tied him "to a stake...bear-like." This is a reference to bear baiting, a blood sport popular in Shakespeare's day, in which bears would be tied to stakes and forced to fight off dogs until they finally succumbed. After setting the tone with this gruesome literary device, which reveals Macbeth's state of mind as the battle approaches, Shakespeare uses irony in two places in the scene. First, when Macbeth points out that young Siward, whom he has just killed, was "born of woman," and exits, only to be followed by Macduff, who, we find out, was not born of woman, having been delivered by Caesarian section. Then there is an example of classic dramatic irony. Siward describes the battle in terms that suggest that Macbeth's castle was taken with relatively little loss. "The castle," he says, "is gently surrounded...little is to do." He does not know that his son was among the dead before the castle walls, killed earlier in the scene by Macbeth. These are the main literary devices in this relatively short, but important scene.

Saturday, January 18, 2014

What kingdom do mammals belong to?

Mammals are organisms who possess the distinctive features of warm blood, mammary glands, three inner ear bones, and hair or fur. Mammalia is a class of animals, and in order to fall into this class, an organism must meet all of these characteristics.


The class Mammalia falls under the phylum Chordata. Chordates, members of Chordata, all possess a bundle of dorsal nerves in addition to a few other distinctive characteristics. In mammals, this bundle of...

Mammals are organisms who possess the distinctive features of warm blood, mammary glands, three inner ear bones, and hair or fur. Mammalia is a class of animals, and in order to fall into this class, an organism must meet all of these characteristics.


The class Mammalia falls under the phylum Chordata. Chordates, members of Chordata, all possess a bundle of dorsal nerves in addition to a few other distinctive characteristics. In mammals, this bundle of nerves is protected by the vertebrae that make up the spine.


Living organisms are even more generally classified into one of six Kingdoms of Life: Archaeabacteria, Eubacteria, Protista, Fungi, Plantae, and Animalia. The kingdom Animalia is distinctive because all members of the "Animal Kingdom" are multicellular, motile organisms who must eat other organisms for energy. Mammals are members of the Animal Kingdom because they are all multicellular organisms who eat other organisms and are capable of movement at some point in their lives.

What is the primary reason for the spread of the Middle East religions?

I would assume the question refers to the three Abrahamic religions that were founded in the Middle East: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Each of these three religions spread in different ways. Judaism spread to different areas of the world because of the diaspora. This was the action of the Romans in exiling the Jewish people from their homeland in the First Century. Judaism did not spread to other populations of non-believers because the faith does...

I would assume the question refers to the three Abrahamic religions that were founded in the Middle East: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Each of these three religions spread in different ways. Judaism spread to different areas of the world because of the diaspora. This was the action of the Romans in exiling the Jewish people from their homeland in the First Century. Judaism did not spread to other populations of non-believers because the faith does not openly seek new converts and because of the close-knit nature of the community. For this reason, Judaism, even today, has the fewest adherents of the five major religions.


Christianity spread to Europe and the rest of the world through the works of missionaries that traveled in an effort to seek converts. The acceptance of Christianity by the Roman Empire was an important development in the faith becoming a major world religion. Islam was primarily spread through contacts that were made through trade. Conquest of new lands by Islamic armies also was important to the introduction of Islam to new lands.

It is believed by some scholars that the operating system is the master instructor. To what extent do you agree with the above statement? Use the...

I completely agree with the statement that the operating system (or OS) is the master instructor. An operating system has the following functions:

  • Provides a user interface: An operating system provides a user interface for input and output of commands. Using this interface, the user feeds in the commands (using a keyboard and a mouse) and obtains an output.

  • Process management: many applications need to use the limited system resources and the operating system prioritizes the use of these resources. Thus, the CPU (central processing unit) time is shared between various processes depending on their priority listing.

  • Memory management: OS also manages the memory of the system and allocates and deallocates the memory to the processes as per the needs.

  • Control of peripheral devices: An OS also controls the peripheral hardware devices such as printers, mouse, keyboard, etc. These devices are commonly used for input and output operations.

  • Maintains the file system: An OS manages the filing system in a computer. It manages how files are created, deleted and accessed and it contains native file systems. 

Looking at all these functionalities, one can deduce that the OS is the master instructor. It manages all the hardware devices and enables input & output into the computer. It controls filing of data and allocates system resources as per the need. Thus, it not only controls the hardware, but also how the system functions and therefore is the master instructor.


Hope this helps. 

Friday, January 17, 2014

Why is Stout smiling at the end of chapter 3 of The Slave Dancer?

Great question! In The Slave Dancer by Paula Fox, Stout smiles at the end of chapter three. Although this might seem like an ordinary reaction, the context illustrates that this smile represents something more.


During this chapter, Purvis is deemed a thief and consequently receives a flogging. In the book, the Captain possesses a personal storage of food, including eggs. One of the Captain's eggs is stolen. Although Purvis is innocent, he is convicted of...

Great question! In The Slave Dancer by Paula Fox, Stout smiles at the end of chapter three. Although this might seem like an ordinary reaction, the context illustrates that this smile represents something more.


During this chapter, Purvis is deemed a thief and consequently receives a flogging. In the book, the Captain possesses a personal storage of food, including eggs. One of the Captain's eggs is stolen. Although Purvis is innocent, he is convicted of the crime and punished.


As Jessie reveals:



“I barely slept that night. Once, I peeped out at the deck. Far above, like a huge tattered bird, its wings flapping, hung Purvis, tied to the shrouds where the wind beat against him as though animated by the same demon which had raised Nicholas Spark’s arm and brought the tarred rope down on his back.”



After this occurs, Jessie learns that Stout is the actual thief. Not only this, but Stout is actually happy that Purvis is deemed the thief and punished. Thus, Jessie’s lack of trust in Stout appears justified.


Following these events, Stout gives Jessie a piece of cheese. Despite this apparent generosity, Jessie throws the cheese away. With this, he shows his knowledge of Stout’s actions and possibly even his disapproval or his lack of trust towards Stout. Although Stout could have been upset by this response, Stout smiles. Jessie explains the actions by stating:



“Stout smiled gently as though he couldn’t blame me.”



Thus, this seemingly simple smile represents a greater concept. With this, Stout now realizes how Jessie feels about his actions. Furthermore, Stout seems to express that he understands (or at least does not blame) Jessie for his impolite gesture of throwing away the cheese.

What did Eliza, Pickering and Higgins each do for a living in Pygmalion?

Eliza sells flowers on the streets of east London, Pickering is a linguist and retired soldier, and Higgins is a linguistic scientist and professor of phonetics. But this doesn't really tell us all that we need to know in a play that is an exploration and critique of the British class system. Higgins and Pickering are vastly wealthier than Eliza, who has never been seen a bathtub and rents a unheated room, barely scraping by...

Eliza sells flowers on the streets of east London, Pickering is a linguist and retired soldier, and Higgins is a linguistic scientist and professor of phonetics. But this doesn't really tell us all that we need to know in a play that is an exploration and critique of the British class system. Higgins and Pickering are vastly wealthier than Eliza, who has never been seen a bathtub and rents a unheated room, barely scraping by on her income of about half a crown a day. To the men, half a crown is pocket change, nothing--to her it is her all in all. This comes out early in the play, when Eliza arrives at Higgins' home prepared to pay a shilling for speech lessons. 


As Higgins says to Pickering:



You know, Pickering, if you consider a shilling, not as a simple shilling, but as a percentage of this girl's income, it works out as fully equivalent to sixty or seventy guineas from a millionaire.



This shilling, laughable to Higgins and Pickering, is, in other words, a large percentage of Eliza's income. 


Higgins thinks the difference in their income means he can treat Eliza despicably, but the play shows there's more to class than the accident of birth. 

Thursday, January 16, 2014

What were three positive and negative effects of the Industrial Revolution?

The Industrial Revolution had both positive and negative consequences, many of which represent two sides of the same dramatic shift in lifestyles. 


First, let's address some of the negative consequences of the Industrial Revolution. As the means of production were shifting from a household or estate basis to a factory setting, many people flocked to the cities in search of work. Unfortunately, housing and infrastructure could not really keep  up with such drastic population growth....

The Industrial Revolution had both positive and negative consequences, many of which represent two sides of the same dramatic shift in lifestyles. 


First, let's address some of the negative consequences of the Industrial Revolution. As the means of production were shifting from a household or estate basis to a factory setting, many people flocked to the cities in search of work. Unfortunately, housing and infrastructure could not really keep  up with such drastic population growth. Much of the new working class lived in cramped and unsanitary homes, rife with disease. The conditions in their places of work-- factories or mines-- were not much better! Many forms of work were dirty and hazardous to health. Some were at greater risk in the work place than others; children were often injured when climbing into machinery to perform repairs. Altogether, the living and working conditions of the working class were very poor, and you could almost be certain that if someone did not die of illness or injury in the work place, they would die of illness spread at home.


Until the establishment of labor unions, many people in the working class received terribly low wages. While a low wage was still something, and more than they might have earned if they had stayed in the country, it was not enough. Those who were ill could not afford medical treatment, and many people worked to manufacture goods they would never be able to purchase. Many suffered malnutrition as a result of not being able to afford enough nutritious food, which had to be transported from the countryside. Poor-houses (also called workhouses) became a staple in Industrial Revolution era Britain, where impoverished people would labor in exchange for a place to sleep and food. Despite sounding like a safe haven, the poor-houses were some of the most unsanitary and dehumanizing institutions to develop.


So, what positive effects represent the other side of the Industrial Revolution? For those able to afford it, the Revolution made available a greater diversity of products. Additionally, there was a greater degree of standardization, so that one might be assured of the same quality in different places or at different times. The Industrial Revolution also had the effect of improving overall quality of life. Though many lived in dirty, cramped homes, cities began making changes to provide clean water, gas, and electricity to all citizens. 


Though employment conditions really suffered in the beginning, one of the long-term effects of the Revolution was an improvement in both employment rates and ethics. The dissatisfaction of factory laborers lead to the establishment of unions who fought for better wages, safer working conditions, and the banning of child labor. It depends on how long after the start of the Revolution you are willing to consider, but improvement in working conditions is certainly one of the positive developments.

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

What does the sun represent in Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451?

In Ray Bradbury’s futuristic story of a dystopian society in which books are banned because of the knowledge they contain, and because of the social dynamics they depict, the sun represents both life and death. Fahrenheit 451 is about a fireman, Guy Montag, whose job, to which he is deeply committed, is to burn books, and the homes of those discovered to be in possession of them. Montag, as with the rest of the firemen, led by Captain Beatty, takes for granted the wisdom of those who control this autocratic society and executes without question the mission of eliminating all vestiges of the previous, presumably fatally-flawed system that this totalitarian regime has long-since replaced. Throughout Bradbury’s narrative, the sun plays a prominent role. Early in the novel’s first section, Montag encounters a teenaged girl of 17, new to his neighborhood. This vibrant, idealistic child is revelatory to the older, jaded fireman. Note, for instance, the following passage from their first meeting:


"Well," she said, "I'm seventeen and I'm crazy. My uncle says the two always go together. When people ask your age, he said, always say seventeen and insane. Isn't this a nice time of night to walk? I like to smell things and look at things, and sometimes stay up all night, walking, and watch the sun rise."



This passage provides the first glimpse of the role the Earth’s nearest star will play, suggesting that it symbolizes enlightenment and innocence. This theme of the proverbial ‘new dawn’ continues, with Montag’s contemplation of this peculiar but welcome newcomer. In the following passage, Bradbury depicts his protagonist as associating this cheerful, optimistic young adult with the light and warmth of the sun:



“Montag shook his head. He looked at a blank wall. The girl's face was there, really quite beautiful in memory: astonishing, in fact. She had a very thin face like the dial of a small clock seen faintly in a dark room in the middle of a night when you waken to see the time and see the clock telling you the hour and the minute and the second, with a white silence and a glowing, all certainty and knowing what it has to tell of the night passing swiftly on toward further darknesses but moving also toward a new sun.”



The reader, then, can be forgiving for concluding that Bradbury’s narrative will focus on the theme of an awakening as Montag begins to reconsider his life and his role in advancing a political agenda that may not be as beneficent as once believed. Montag’s transformation, subtly initiated with the arrival of Clarisse, gains speed with the destruction of the old woman’s books and home, a development marked by the victim’s self-immolation in her final act of defiance. In this scene, the light from the fire illuminates the wisdom and poetry contained in these doomed volumes. It is obviously no accident that the one sentence that briefly catches Montag’s eye, and that literally and figuratively burns itself into Montag’s consciousness, is from the 19th century poet Alexander Smith: "Time has fallen asleep in the afternoon sunshine." If the sun represent enlightenment, that association is perverted by the regime that rules this society with an iron fist. Explaining to his subordinate the reason books were banned, Captain Beatty rails against the darkness books once represented, telling Montag, that the academics who produced works of nonfiction were “running about, putting out the stars and extinguishing the sun.”


The sun, in other words, means different things to different people, depending upon one’s views of the autocratic system that governs this society. To Montag, the sun means life; to others, like his wife, Mildred, and to Beatty, it means security from the thoughts and facts expressed in books. In one scene at his home, his decision to pursue knowledge coming between his already distant and uncaring wife and himself, he contemplates the darkness of the parlour in their home and how that room could “teem with life if they switched on the electronic sun.”


It is Part III of Fahrenheit 451, titled “Burning Bright,” that the importance of the sun to Bradbury’s story is given its greatest illumination. Captain Beatty having discovered Montag’s secret, the too-perceptive commander has cornered the now-insubordinate fireman: "Well," said Beatty, "now you did it. Old Montag wanted to fly near the sun and now that he's burnt his damn wings, he wonders why.”


Montag has begun to view the sun in the duality that dominates Bradbury’s narrative. It represents life and death; darkness and illumination. In perhaps the novel’s seminal passage, Montag comes to his greatest realization of the role he has played in the world and the existential need to break from his past:



“He saw the moon low in the sky now. The moon there, and the light of the moon caused by what? By the sun, of course. And what lights the sun? Its own fire. And the sun goes on, day after day, burning and burning. The sun and time. The sun and time and burning. Burning. . .Burning. . .After a long time of floating on the land and a short time of floating in the river he knew why he must never burn again in his life. The sun burned every day. It burned Time. The world rushed in a circle and turned on its axis and time was busy burning the years and the people anyway, without any help from him. So if he burnt things with the firemen, and the sun burnt Time, that meant that everything burned! One of them had to stop burning. The sun wouldn't, certainly. So it looked as if it had to be Montag and the people he had worked with until a few short hours ago.”



As Fahrenheit 451 draws to a close, Montag has fled the city and its destruction, the fires of the burning metropolis lighting the distant horizon. Now, again, the sun’s role in Bradbury’s narrative returns full-circle. The first appearance of the sun with the start of a new day is highly symbolic of Montag’s role in rebuilding a new society—one characterized by the wisdom and beauty contained in the minds of those who endeavored to memorize the contents of books. The sun once more represents light and warmth, in more than just the literal sense.


The core of the sun contains incomprehensible levels of heat and thermonuclear activity. It contains the power to destroy the solar system, as it will eventually do in the normal course of a star’s life. In Ray Bradbury’s story, the light and heat generated by the sun both destroys and renews.

What are similarities between Julius Caesar and Brutus, and how do they lead to their downfalls?

Both Julius Caesar and Brutus are extremely proud men. This may be why they are such good friends. In Antony's funeral speech he says:


For Brutus, as you know, was Caesar's angel.
Judge, O you gods, how dearly Caesar loved him!     I.2



Caesar can be friends with an equally proud man because he knows that Brutus is a reclusive, scholarly type who would never become a competitor. Caesar hides his own pride from the populace by deliberately acting humble and modest. Brutus is a solitary type of man who is not ambitious either for riches, fame or power. Nevertheless, when he finds himself the leader of the conspiracy he becomes overbearing. He believes that only his own ideas have any value and insists on having them carried out. He is a kind, generous, trusting man, but he reveals his one fault of what might be called hubris continually. Even his agonizing over whether to participate in the conspiracy against Caesar displays his hubris. He seems to think everything depends on his decision. Notice how he speaks to Cassius in Act 1, Scene 2 and to the plebeians in Act 3, Scene 2.



That you do love me, I am nothing jealous;
What you would work me to, I have some aim.



Brutus' entire reply to Cassius is crammed with the words "I," "me," and "my." Brutus is a supreme egotist, just like his great friend Caesar. Here is a bit from Brutus' funeral speech after the assassination:



Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor, that you may believe. Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses, that you may the better judge.



Brutus' entire funeral speech is about himself and his honorable intentions. He permits Antony to follow him in addressing the plebeians because he is so sure of his charisma and eloquence that he thinks anything Antony might say will be overshadowed or negated by what he himself will say. Antony knew how to manipulate Brutus into getting his permission to speak at Caesar's funeral. He appealed to Brutus' self-image as a noble, benevolent man.


Brutus is a thinker and Caesar is a man of action, but both men are infatuated with themselves. Caesar is killed because his great pride inspires him to become the sole monarch of the Roman empire. His ambitions are too obvious and too inimical to the interests of too many others. Brutus' great pride is self-contained. He is an introvert. He likes solitary meditation and reading. But by keeping himself so much to himself, Brutus does not acquire the "street smarts," the worldly wisdom that is seen in Caesar, Cassius, and Antony. Therefore, Brutus makes many bad mistakes. Trusting Cassius is one mistake. Trusting Antony is another. Brutus should never have allowed Cassius to talk him into joining the conspiracy against Caesar in the first place. Even Cassius says ao:



Well, Brutus, thou art noble; yet, I see
Thy honorable metal may be wrought
From that it is disposed; therefore it is meet
That noble minds keep ever with their likes;
For who so firm that cannot be seduced? 
Caesar doth bear me hard, but he loves Brutus.
If I were Brutus now, and he were Cassius,
He should not humor me.          Act I, Scene 2